Improvement of the Evaluation of Seismic Risk in Fault Areas by Lidar-Derived Geophysical Data
Keywords:
Mobile Lidar, DEM Generation, Fault Zone Analysis, High-Resolution Mapping, Interpolation Methods, Lidar Technology.Abstract
This study aimed to improve the methods of assessing seismic risk in fault zones based on lidar data in geophysics. The research highlighted this by comparing the newly developed fault maps with the usual methods of fault mapping and how lidar technology developed high-resolution 3D mapping. We conducted mobile and terrestrial LIDAR surveys to produce DEMs and study the attributes of the fault zones. The technique involved mobile lidar systems with different specifications of emitted transmission rate: 45 000 m/s to 52, 100m/s pulse repetition: 190, 000 Hz–220, 000 Hz; and point density: 10223 points/m2 to 14567 points/m2. Terrestrial lidar surveys used scanner heights of 1. 500-1. 700m and obtained the horizontal and vertical sampling density, ranging from 240,456 to 315,678 points per square meter. We used LAStools, Arc GIS, and QISIS software to filter, classify, and visualize the data processing. e applied interpolation techniques such as IDW, Kriging, Spline, and Natural Neighbors to generate DEMs. Research outcomes identified 15 different fault segments with lengths varying from 10. 000-20. 000 km, along with maximum displacements of 0. 987-4. 567 m, and average slip rates of 3. 456-7. 890 mm/year. The most extended fault segment altogether was FS05, which was 20. 000 km with a maximum bidding distance of 4. 567 m and a 7. 890 mm/year slip rate. We discovered that the proposed method successfully filtered out noise points from lidar data, with the noise points varying between 0.111-0.266 million. We created DEMs with vertical rms errors ranging from 0.045-0.050 m. The study revealed that lidar technology offers accurate and dense geospatial data, essential for discriminating between fault zones. This approach dramatically improves seismic hazard analysis and the identification of the best ways to minimize risks. These are increasing lidar surveys in other seismically active regions, using multiple data sources for analysis, and deploying constant surveys in high-risk fault line regions to increase consistency in detecting surface changes and tectonic activity.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.