Journal of Multidisciplinary Cases https://hmjournals.com/ijaap/index.php/JMC <p>The <strong>Journal of Multidisciplinary Cases (JMC) </strong>having<strong>ISSN 2799-0990 </strong>is a double-blind, peer-reviewed, open access journal that provides publication of articles in all areas . The objective of this journal is to provide a veritable platform for scientists and researchers all over the world to promote, share, and discuss a variety of innovative ideas and developments in all aspects of <strong>various fields</strong>.</p> en-US editorinchief.jmc@gmail.com (Editor in Chief) editorinchief.jmc@gmail.com (Tech Support) Fri, 03 Apr 2026 05:30:54 +0000 OJS 3.3.0.20 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Bridging disciplines in clinical practice: a comprehensive case analysis https://hmjournals.com/ijaap/index.php/JMC/article/view/6172 <p>Background: Multisystem disorders in patients that are difficult to solve in a single-specialty approach are becoming more and more a reality to contemporary clinical medicine. A new paradigm of dealing with this complexity has been the emergence of interdisciplinary collaboration.</p> <p>Purpose: The paper will provide five well-chosen clinical cases analyses to investigate the impact of an organized interdisciplinary team (IDT) collaboration on diagnostic accuracy, therapeutic decision making as well as patient outcomes in various fields of diseases.</p> <p>Methods: The retrospective case-series approach was selected and involved the examination of inpatients treated using formal IDT consultations in three tertiary-care hospitals between January 2022 and December 2023. Cases were sampled to reflect cardio metabolic, neuro-infectious, ophthalmological, musculoskeletal-geriatric, and autoimmune cases.</p> <p>Findings: In all five cases, IDT was improved by delivering a structured management, which resulted in feasible clinical gains achieved, including 30-day readmission prevention, glycaemic control, neurologic, regained ambulation, and remission of an autoimmune disease. Some of the common facilitating factors were shared care plans, joint specialist ward rounds, and goal setting with patients. Some of the barriers experienced included scheduling conflicts, fragmentation of electronic health records, and role ambiguity. Inference: Multi-disciplinary teamwork with a structure is related to optimal clinical outcomes in multisystem disease. Both spread clinical translation and broad clinical translation will be fundamentally dependent on investment in communication infrastructure and formal training in IDT.</p> Mustafa Musa Copyright (c) 2026 Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://hmjournals.com/ijaap/index.php/JMC/article/view/6172 Sat, 03 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000 A multidisciplinary approach to complex case management: integrating perspectives across specialties https://hmjournals.com/ijaap/index.php/JMC/article/view/6173 <p>Background: The modern healthcare requires more and more cases of patients with numerous, clinically relevant, simultaneous conditions to be treated. These complicated cases, which are marked by the existence of a mixture of medical, psychological, pharmacological, and socioeconomic issues-, have been regularly beyond the reach of a single clinical field. The multidisciplinary team (MDT) models provide an orderly, patient-focused approach, whereby a systematically coordinated and formal incorporation of different specialist views is achieved into a coordinated care system.</p> <p>Aim: The aim of this study is to determine the clinical performance, operational viability, and patient experience with a formally designed MDT model compared to traditional silted care in handling complex and multi-morbid patients in a tertiary hospital.</p> <p>Methods: A prospective cohort study was designed to be mixed-methods based, and took place at three tertiary referral hospitals in the period of January 2022 and December 2023. Out of 348 adult patients with three or more comorbidities were recruited and assigned to MDT intervention (n= 185) or standard care (n= 163) control group. In the MDT model, weekly interdisciplinary rounds comprising of internists, cardiologists, psychiatrists, clinical pharmacists, dietitians, physiotherapists, and social workers were implemented. The main outcomes were 30-day readmission rate, length of stay, and patient satisfaction. Secondary results included medication errors, compliance to the care plan, and quality-of-life indices.</p> <p>Findings: MDT group showed statistically significant results in all outcomes. The 30-day readmission rate reduced to 12.4% (p &lt; 0.001). An average length of stay decreased (8.9 to 6.2 days, p &lt; 0.001). The patient satisfaction increased to 4.3 as compared to 3.6 on the five-point scale (p &lt; 0.001). The rates of medication errors reduced by 56 percent, and compliance with care plans rose by 43 percent. Conclusion: Structured MDT-based case management can help to improve clinical outcomes, patient experience, and resource use in multi-morbid populations with complexities in a significant manner to justify its systematic implementation in routine healthcare provision across the globe.</p> Dr. Mayur R Bhoyar Copyright (c) 2026 Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://hmjournals.com/ijaap/index.php/JMC/article/view/6173 Wed, 28 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000